• Home
  • About this blog

Intro to Political Theory Blog

Contributions by students of PoliSci 101

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Machiavellianism in a Democracy
Karl Marx Today »

Identity Theft: Security vs. Liberty

December 15, 2009 by willmattson

Every decision in life is a trade off, whether or not you take the bus or walk, what type of clothing you wear, whether you study or go out.  All decisions come with consequence. Hobbes mused about a more serious tradeoff in many of his writings, a tradeoff that is faced regularly by sovereigns governing the commonwealth.  Remove the freedoms of its citizens, or fall into a State of Nature.  When a government takes away some freedoms of its citizens one could argue that the population is generally more secure and less vulnerable to the chaos of the State of Nature. Hobbes believed that governments were under a “moral, not legislative obligation” to keep their people safe.  He believed that there was a “constant war” without regulation and that every sovereign was faced with a decision.  Keep his commonwealth safe and limit the freedoms man is naturally born with, or allow his commonwealth to regress into a dystopic State of Nature. In the 21st century this same conflict presents itself in the area of personal finance, people have gained greater, easier, and more efficient access to their own financial information through e banking. This places our current government in a dilemma. Should banking be limited to secure, face-to-face transactions that eliminate a large portion of the risk for identity theft? Or should we continue as we are, in a vulnerable society of e transactions?

Hobbes favored an all-powerful monarch over any other form of government to regulate a nation, as well as the security of said Leviathan over the constant war of the State of Nature.  While Hobbes believed that every man had a right to everything, the need for self-preservation was his first law of nature.  In accordance with this fundamental law, people take all kinds of precautions to preserve their identity.  From shredding sensitive documents to the safeguards (both cyber and otherwise) put in place by institutions that regularly access their customers’ personal financial information.  In spite of these precautions, identity theft is the fastest growing type of cyber crime due to its lucrative results, high level of anonymity, and relative ease.  In 2005 alone, over 42 million Americans became susceptible to identity theft through malicious attacks on databases holding sensitive financial information.  This recent rise in identity thefts has coincided with the growing popularity of Internet banking as well as developments that have made technology easier to use than ever.

While it may be up to the individual citizen to regulate and protect themselves in this situation, Sean Hoar, a top US attorney for cyber-crime recently wrote that he believes the two most pressing needs in the fight against identity theft are the establishment of a national response system and a national threat and vulnerability reduction system for cyber-crime.  Under their moral obligation to keep their citizens safe, the government must take the steps outlined by Hoar to police the Internet against the rapidly rising threat of identity theft.

While there is no cure-all solution to the problem of identity theft, the issue remains a pressing concern.  This modern problem presents current sovereigns with the same dilemma that was presented during Hobbes’ day: keep the commonwealth secure, or allow them uninhibited freedom and the risks that come with it.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on December 15, 2009 at 11:26 pm nasser2209

    This is an interesting topic that does happen constantly in recent day society. I actually have a relative that was victim of identity theft and it actually ruined his life. I would have to agree that you could relate Hobbes views about everything being a “constant war” to the identity theft of many of people today. Even though there is no cure to identity theft, it would not be a good idea to encourage Hobbes because that would only make things worse and it may even lead to other crimes and hurt the society even greater.

    -Ali Nasser
    Section 10


  2. on December 15, 2009 at 11:32 pm saradzi

    I agree that the “cures” to identity theft are limited, but I do think that prevention could be improved as a means of eliminating theft. I say this because I am now an independent student living on my own with my accounts and I have never been told anything to help prevent my identity from being stolen. I am so ignorant on the topic that I don’t know if it’s even preventable. Maybe thats why I have never been told how to prevent it! For some reason … I think that might be wishful thinking 😉



Comments are closed.

  • Blogroll

    • Crooked Timber
    • Public Reason
    • What I Saw in America
  • Categories

    • Burke
    • Hobbes
    • justice
    • Locke
    • Machiavelli
    • MLK
    • obedience
    • political action
    • Political Theory In the News
    • race and racism
    • religion
    • Rousseau
    • Section 10
    • Section 11
    • Section 12
    • Section 13
    • Section 2
    • Section 3
    • Section 4
    • Section 5
    • Section 6
    • Section 7
    • Section 8
    • Section 9
    • Socrates
    • U.S. politics
    • Uncategorized
  • Recent Posts

    • Charlie Chaplin Modern Times
    • Censorship
    • Honey, It’s All About Top Down and Upside Down..
    • Karl Marx Today
    • Identity Theft: Security vs. Liberty
  • Recent Comments

    tofu96 on The Leviathan Metaphor
    Stuart on Trustee vs. Delegate
    Gentur on Kant, NOFX, and the Demise of…
    Illuminati on Machiavelli: On the Holoc…
    soulcrushed on How Marriage Today Is Slavery…
  • Archives

    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
  • Burke Hobbes justice Locke Machiavelli MLK obedience political action Political Theory In the News race and racism religion Rousseau Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Socrates U.S. politics Uncategorized
  • "Big Three" 2000. 20-42. Print. Kant 2008. 522-525. Print. abortion Ashcroft being a woman and other disabilities Bill Burr by Pat Harrington cigarette Communism constitution delegate Dirty hands disability Engels Enlightenment equality Fear federalists fine Foreign Policy Freud Gay Marriage George Bush George W. Bush Group project guns Healthcare Higher education Hobbes Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” Modern Political Thought: Readings from Machiavelli to Nietzsche. 2nd ed. Ed. David Wootton. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Iraq Joe Wilson Kant Karl Rove landlord Locke Love Machiavelli Makaveli Marx Marxism media Mill Millage MLK music Nancy Pelosi Obama Plato. “Apology.” The Trial and Death of Socrates. Trams. G.M.A. Grube. 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Political Theory In the News Prince representation Rousseau second amendment Second Treatise of Government section 004 Section 008 Section 03 Section 06 Section 8 Sports subjection of women Tea Parties the communist manifesto The Instruments of Production the music industry the playing fields of eton Tom Ridge trustee Tupac Utopia Violence War on Terror Washtenaw County

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: